News:

Welcome to the SoA Forum.  You are welcome to browse through and contribute to the Forums listed below.

Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Ancient and Medieval History / Re: Marathon Helmet
Last post by Imperial Dave - Today at 09:59:11 AM
not something to lose one's head over...
#2
Weapons and Tactics / Re: Mycenaean armour tested
Last post by Imperial Dave - Today at 09:58:11 AM
Absolutely. Read the Mabinogian  :)
#3
Ancient and Medieval History / Re: Marathon Helmet
Last post by Keraunos - Today at 09:48:28 AM
Quote from: Erpingham on Today at 09:31:54 AMThere is a less journalistic account of the provenance of this helmet on the Royal Ontario Museum website.  Curiously, the finder also went to Thermopylae and found another "Spartan" helmet there (but no skull).

It might be interesting to find out how many Spartan helmets from Thermopylae there are in collections around the world, and whether there are more of them than 300 or than pieces of the true cross?
#4
Weapons and Tactics / Re: Mycenaean armour tested
Last post by Erpingham - Today at 09:44:28 AM
Quote from: Keraunos on Today at 01:14:32 AMSo the Mycenaeans were from Wales as well were they now?

I thought actually they were from the other side.  Brutus, the ancestor of the Ancient British, and hence Welsh, was a Trojan.  The Trojans also founded the Roman Empire.  What are the odds ?  :)
#5
Ancient and Medieval History / Re: Marathon Helmet
Last post by Erpingham - Today at 09:31:54 AM
There is a less journalistic account of the provenance of this helmet on the Royal Ontario Museum website.  Curiously, the finder also went to Thermopylae and found another "Spartan" helmet there (but no skull).
#6
Quote from: gavindbm on May 28, 2024, 10:16:11 PMHow about 'medieval infantry was useless against (easily defeated by) mounted knights'.

As it happens, I was wondering about something on the "Age of Cavalry". I think that something of the old attitudes of Charles Oman back in 1885 still pervade at least wargamer history

Troops like the Scotch Lowlanders, with their long spears, or the Saracen auxiliaries of Frederick II, with their cross-bows, deserved and obtained some respect on account of the uniformity of their equipment. But with ordinary infantry the case was different; exposed, without discipline and with a miscellaneous assortment of dissimilar weapons, to a cavalry charge, they could not combine to withstand it, but were ridden down and crushed. A few infantry successes which appear towards the end of the period were altogether exceptional in character. The infantry of the 'Great Company,' in the East beat the Duke of Athens, by inducing him to charge with all his men-at-arms into a swamp. In a similar way the victory of Courtrai was secured, not by the mallets and iron-shod staves of the Flemings, but by the canal, into which the headlong onset of the French cavalry thrust rank after rank of their companions.

Note how tactical competence of the infantry has been reduced to some luck with terrain.

We might also note he said

When the enemy came in sight, nothing could restrain the Western knights: the shield was shifted into position, the lance dropped into rest, the spur touched the charger, and the mail-clad line thundered on, regardless of what might be before it. As often as not its career ended in being dashed against a stone wall or tumbled into a canal, in painful flounderings in a bog, or futile surgings around a palisade.

I think this created a persistent myth which turned up in many wargames rules - impetuous knights.

In fact, even Oman moved away from being quite so extreme in his two volume 1924 version of the Art of War in the Middle Ages.

Calling it a myth, though, is a tough one because academic military historians are divided about the relative importance of cavalry and infantry pre 1300 and whether there was an Infantry Revolution in the 14th century. So you have the Bachrach's and their school proclaiming infantry was alway the dominant force on the battlefield, whereas the counter-revisionists saying "Hang on a minute - rubbish infantry might have been a myth but knightly cavalry was the decisive arm."  Perhaps needs more of an examination in its own right than putting in there among the myths, though.

#7
Weapons and Tactics / Re: Mycenaean armour tested
Last post by Ian61 - Today at 08:03:13 AM
It has always been my opinion that ceremonial armour probably evolves from battlefield armour OR is more artistically worked version of battlefield armour. The alternative, that someone decides to coat themselves with metal clothes, does not make much sense. I know some ceremonial clothes have become ridiculously unwieldy but this is also often an evolution over time.
#10
Ancient and Medieval History / The Samnites
Last post by Imperial Dave - Today at 06:34:59 AM
https://greekreporter.com/2024/05/28/samnites-italian-enemies-rome/

Short article on the Samnites mYbe of interest...