News:

Welcome to the SoA Forum.  You are welcome to browse through and contribute to the Forums listed below.

Main Menu

Article on Roman Skirmishing

Started by Prufrock, December 03, 2016, 05:07:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Prufrock

This article was mentioned on the Lost Battles group as being of possible relevance.

"The 'Face of Roman Skirmishing'," Historia: zeitschrift für alte geschichte Vol. 64, No 3, 2015, pp. 263-300.

Has anyone been able to get hold of it?

Duncan Head

Duncan Head

Prufrock


Dangun

One line from the thesis was:
"we gave no eyewitness accounts of the combat for our period (263BC - AD235)." (p. 7)

Is that true?

And is Polybius considered an eyewitness, or not?

RichT

Actual quote: "In addition, since we have no eyewitness accounts of the combat for our period apart from Caesar's commentaries, there is a significant dearth of evidence on the matter".

Just before someone says "What about Caesar!"

Polybius as an eyewitness - depends what of. Of any of the combats, in particular pitched battles, in his Histories, no. Of fighting of some sort (particularly skirmishing), probably yes. It's not totally clear in Anders' thesis what 'the combat' is in this case (light infantry, heavy, or all?). Broadly speaking it's probably a fair statement.

Dangun

Quote from: RichT on December 06, 2016, 09:01:34 AM
Just before someone says "What about Caesar!"

Well corrected...

Quote from: RichT on December 06, 2016, 09:01:34 AM
Polybius as an eyewitness - depends what of. Of any of the combats, in particular pitched battles, in his Histories, no.

Interesting. I don't know either way, but I seem to remember that it has been suggested otherwise on this forum.

RichT

Quote from: Dangun on December 06, 2016, 09:58:32 AM

Quote from: RichT on December 06, 2016, 09:01:34 AM
Polybius as an eyewitness - depends what of. Of any of the combats, in particular pitched battles, in his Histories, no.

Interesting. I don't know either way, but I seem to remember that it has been suggested otherwise on this forum.

Well he was at the sack of Carthage, if that counts as 'the combat'. Accompanying Scipio, it's a fair assumption he saw the Roman army in action. But beyond that is I think unknown (at least, it's unknown to me). We don't know what he might have seen or done in the period before his Roman exile. I think opinions differ how much personal military experience he had. At any rate, I don't think any of his combat accounts, aside from the sack of Carthage, are eyewitness accounts (so far as I know).

Dangun

Josephus would have to be an exception.

Yin Shao Loong

A very interesting and useful reference. Thanks, Aaron and Duncan.