SoA Forums

History => Ancient and Medieval History => Topic started by: Imperial Dave on March 12, 2024, 05:55:26 PM

Title: Roman city bigger than suspected
Post by: Imperial Dave on March 12, 2024, 05:55:26 PM
https://phys-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/phys.org/news/2024-03-houses-perspective-britain-roman-period.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQGsAEggAID#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17102595888160&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2024-03-houses-perspective-britain-roman-period.html

Very interesting new thoughts
Title: Re: Roman city bigger than suspected
Post by: CarlL on March 12, 2024, 07:38:54 PM
Thanks Dave for posting.
An interesting piece on Calleva Atrebatum, near modern Silchester, and the themes of trying to estimate population sizes, and 'urban' expanses, when remains are either underneath a continuously occupied site or like Calleva Atrebatum, a site where much building was wooden (so left no visible to the eye stone layers) and 'modern' scanning systems have not been extensively used.
CarlL
Title: Re: Roman city bigger than suspected
Post by: Ian61 on March 12, 2024, 07:43:44 PM
Does this also feed back into the importance of Roman Britain for the Empire. Adding to the evidence that there was more here that needed protecting by the legions than history, as accepted and presented in the last century, would perhaps have lead us to believe.
Title: Re: Roman city bigger than suspected
Post by: Imperial Dave on March 12, 2024, 07:44:36 PM
It would seem so