News:

Welcome to the SoA Forum.  You are welcome to browse through and contribute to the Forums listed below.

Main Menu

New Research on Justinian Plague

Started by Mark, May 12, 2013, 11:42:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mark

(The Discovery Channel's headline is "Plague Helped Bring Down Roman Empire", which this brief article doesn't really support.)

http://news.discovery.com/history/archaeology/plague-helped-fall-of-roman-empire-130510.htm

Plague may have helped finish off the Roman Empire, researchers now reveal.

Plague is a fatal disease so infamous that it has become synonymous with any dangerous, widespread contagion. It was linked to one of the first known examples of biological warfare, when Mongols catapulted plague victims into cities.

The bacterium that causes plague, Yersinia pestis, has been linked with at least two of the most devastating pandemics in recorded history. One, the Great Plague, which lasted from the 14th to 17th centuries, included the infamous epidemic known as the Black Death, which may have killed nearly two-thirds of Europe in the mid-1300s. Another, the Modern Plague, struck around the world in the 19th and 20th centuries, beginning in China in the mid-1800s and spreading to Africa, the Americas, Australia, Europe and other parts of Asia.

Although past studies confirmed this germ was linked with both of these catastrophes, much controversy existed as to whether it also caused the Justinianic Plague of the sixth to eighth centuries. This pandemic, named after the Byzantine emperor Justinian I, killed more than 100 million people. Some historians have suggested it contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire.

To help solve this mystery, scientists investigated ancient DNA from the teeth of 19 different sixth-century skeletons from a medieval graveyard in Bavaria, Germany, of people who apparently succumbed to the Justinianic Plague.

They unambiguously found the plague bacterium Y. pestis there.

"It is always very exciting when we can find out the actual cause of the pestilences of the past," said researcher Barbara Bramanti, an archaeogeneticist at Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany.

"After such a long time -- nearly 1,500 years -- one is still able to detect the agent of plague by modern molecular methods," researcher Holger Scholz, a molecular microbiologist at the Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology in Munich, Germany, told LiveScience.

The researchers said these findings confirm that the Justinianic Plague crossed the Alps, killing people in what is now Bavaria. Analysis of the DNA suggests that much like the later two pandemics of plague, this first pandemic originated in Asia, "even if historical records say that it arrived first in Africa before spreading to the Mediterranean basin and to Europe," Bramanti told LiveScience.

After the Modern Plague spread worldwide, it became entrenched in many rural areas, and the World Health Organization still reports thousands of cases of plague each year. However, doctors can now treat it with modern antibiotics.

The researchers now hope to reconstruct the whole genome sequence of the plague strain in these ancient teeth to learn more about the disease, Scholz said.

The scientists detailed their findings online May 2 in the journal PLOS Pathogens.


Mark G

I remember seeing something a good many years ago on this topic,

it argued that sometime in the late empire, a plague of some description moved north from Africa and became settled in the marshes and lagoons of Italy itself.

it showed an increase in pre Christian religious practices especially, and bone condition for graves to indicate evidence and that whatever it was sent folk scurrying back to the old ways for protection, and there was something else about the wheat supply.

and it concluded that this left too few men to actually man the legions, and hence the reliance on foederati.

never seen anything else on it until now though, so it was probably just a 'now revealed'' theory.

Patrick Waterson

The plague of Justinian also ties in with a mention in British sources: the Annales Cambriae record that ten years after Camlann "There was a great plague, in which Mailcun King of Genedota [Gwynedd] passed away."  The timing for this would be c.550, give or take a few years.  A precursor plague is mentioned at the time of Camlann ten years earlier: "Gueith Camlann in which Arthur and Medrait were slain and there was plague in Britain and Ireland". ('Gueith' means strife, battle.)

The scientists have done a good job pinning down yersina pestis as the agent of Justinian's plague.  All they need now is a few Athenian skeletons from 430-ish BC to wrap up the Plague of Pericles one way or another.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Winston Churchill