News:

Welcome to the SoA Forum.  You are welcome to browse through and contribute to the Forums listed below.

Main Menu

Roman jewellery found in ancient Japanese tomb

Started by Mark, June 29, 2012, 04:04:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mark


DougM

Except it would have travelled there via the overland Spice route, and then possibly been traded via China or Korea. Or are you reviving the Tokharian heresy Mark? ;-)
"Let the great gods Mithra and Ahura help us, when the swords are loudly clashing, when the nostrils of the horses are a tremble,...  when the strings of the bows are whistling and sending off sharp arrows."  http://aleadodyssey.blogspot.com/


Erpingham

Quote from: DougM on June 30, 2012, 02:45:47 AM
Except it would have travelled there via the overland Spice route, and then possibly been traded via China or Korea.

Indirect trade is the obvious answer.  Why then the speculation about Roman "influence" in Japan in these articles? 


Duncan Head

Because even making distant people like, and preserve, your pretty beads is a form of influence?
Duncan Head

Erpingham

Quote from: Duncan Head on July 03, 2012, 03:45:07 PM
Because even making distant people like, and preserve, your pretty beads is a form of influence?

Hmmm...  But did they know where they came from, or were they as ignorant of the details of the West as the Romans were of the Far East? 

Buyer : I like these beads - very shiny
Seller : Yes, they've just come in from China
Buyer : I've never seen such Chinese beads before!
Seller : These come all the way from the mysterious West
Buyer : Wow, that explains the massive price tag!




Jim Webster

Mysterious west was good for a 100% mark up, especially if her next door couldn't get any

Jim

Duncan Head

And now, http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/social_affairs/AJ201411130064 -

QuoteKASHIHARA, Nara Prefecture--A glass dish unearthed from a burial mound here is the first of its kind confirmed to have come to Japan from the Roman Empire, a research team said.

A round cut glass bowl, discovered with the glass plate, was found to have originated in Sassanid Persia (226-651), the researchers said.

The dish and bowl were retrieved together from the No. 126 tumulus of the Niizawa Senzuka cluster of ancient graves, a national historic site. The No. 126 tumulus dates back to the late fifth century.
...
"The dish was likely produced around the Mediterranean Sea and then transferred to Sassanid Persia," ...  "After it was painted there, the plate was probably taken to Japan."
...
"Because the glass dish may have been transported via Central Asia, it is no wonder that there was a time lag (between its production and arrival in Japan)."
Duncan Head

Patrick Waterson

Nice to see the Silk Road working both ways.  This emergence of Roman-origin items in Japanese tombs may say more about Japanese interaction/trade with the mainland than about Roman trade with the Far East, although it certainly helps to confirm the latter.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Winston Churchill

Duncan Head

The suggestion that the plate was made in the Roman empire, painted in the Persian empire, and then shipped via Central Asia, does bear out what was said earlier in this thread about indirect trade.

And of all the mental images that we have of Imperial Rome, a source of exotic glass trinkets is probably not high up the list.
Duncan Head

Jim Webster

Quote from: Patrick Waterson on November 19, 2014, 11:39:31 AM
Nice to see the Silk Road working both ways.  This emergence of Roman-origin items in Japanese tombs may say more about Japanese interaction/trade with the mainland than about Roman trade with the Far East, although it certainly helps to confirm the latter.

Well the silk road had to work both ways, one cannot imagine China pouring silk into the west for centuries without ever getting paid for it  8)

I think the problem is that the silk road is largely a 'literary artifact' in that we read about it and its importance but we don't see the results
We do find some silk  and other exotic goods, but by definition silk and spices are consumable commodities.
Whatever was sent back probably fell into the same category, even silver would have ended up being reworked from coinage or bullion into locally produced artifacts.
It would be interesting to see how many examples of Japanese manufacture have made it west

Jim

Patrick Waterson

Quote from: Jim Webster on November 19, 2014, 12:49:34 PM

Well the silk road had to work both ways, one cannot imagine China pouring silk into the west for centuries without ever getting paid for it  8)


Apparently much of the payment was in silver, leading to an empire-wide shortage by Diocletian's time.  (This is just memory of something read - no reference, sorry.)

Quote
It would be interesting to see how many examples of Japanese manufacture have made it west


Before Honda, Hitachi, etc., naturally.  Iron and pottery seem to have been strictly one-way.  The only Japanese contribution that appears, or seems to appear, outside the home islands is drawings and figurines similar to the enigmatic dogu of the Jomon period, e.g. those found at Mohenjo Daro (although I see more differences than similarities).

Then again, if this site can be believed, Kofun period tomb architecture was exported quite a long way ...
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." - Winston Churchill

Jason Thorns

Hmm... declining western empire, silver shortage as wealth being sent east for goods, sounds familiar, presumably they couldn't print more money in those days ;)
" and that they should live all together on an equal footing; merit to be their only road to eminence, and the disgrace of evil, and credit of worthy acts, their one measure of difference between man and man."

Duncan Head

Quote from: Jason Thorns on November 19, 2014, 10:29:08 PM.... presumably they couldn't print more money in those days ;)
Reducing the silver content of the denarius is pretty much the same thing!
Duncan Head

Jim Webster

Quote from: Duncan Head on November 20, 2014, 08:47:08 AM
Quote from: Jason Thorns on November 19, 2014, 10:29:08 PM.... presumably they couldn't print more money in those days ;)
Reducing the silver content of the denarius is pretty much the same thing!

I remember reading that one Roman 'silver' coin found in Britain not only contained no silver, but was predominantly composed of lead from which the naturally occurring silver had been removed. It struck me as an almost 'negative' silver coinage  ;D

Jim