Author Topic: Arthur's dykes  (Read 835 times)

Anton

  • Society Member
  • Posts: 339
  • Interests: Piquet DBMM
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #165 on: January 13, 2020, 02:02:53 PM »
Kent is interesting. Keeps its original name, Christianity survives and native British law is finally eradicated on the 9th of April 1925 when the Administration of Estates Act received royal assent.

All in all I'd suggest that this probably means the account of Vortigern's foedus with Hengist is likely right in its essentials. 

Hengist seems to behave in terms of native name, religion and law as someone who saw themselves as an legitimate authority rather than as a conqueror.
  • Stephen Brennan

Holly

  • Committee Member
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4639
  • Country: wales
  • Dave Hollin aka The Backpackbrewer
    • The Backpackbrewer
  • Interests: Ancients, Dark Ages
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #166 on: January 13, 2020, 03:08:51 PM »
I believe there is a split of views on whether Hengist (and Horsa) are real or 'legendary' personages that acrue local affiliations to legitimise royal lines.... I still tend to the former but see the point of the latter
  • Dave Hollin

Anton

  • Society Member
  • Posts: 339
  • Interests: Piquet DBMM
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #167 on: January 13, 2020, 03:22:36 PM »
Yes, indeed and the gable ends stuff.  On the other hand there's the Finnsburgh fragment.  I think it's the process that's most interesting.
  • Stephen Brennan

Duncan Head

  • Former Officer
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3743
  • Country: england
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #168 on: January 13, 2020, 03:23:39 PM »
I believe there is a split of views on whether Hengist (and Horsa) are real or 'legendary' personages that acrue local affiliations to legitimise royal lines.... I still tend to the former but see the point of the latter
I think some authors accept Hengist but not "his wife (or horse) Horsa", if only because Hengest appears in the Finnsburg Fragment without Horsa.
  • Duncan Head

Holly

  • Committee Member
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4639
  • Country: wales
  • Dave Hollin aka The Backpackbrewer
    • The Backpackbrewer
  • Interests: Ancients, Dark Ages
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #169 on: January 13, 2020, 03:51:47 PM »
and indeed interestingly studied by one esteemed Professor Tolkien..
  • Dave Hollin

Erpingham

  • Society Member
  • Posts: 5383
  • Country: gb
  • Interests: Medieval warfare, Old School, home made rules
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #170 on: January 13, 2020, 05:21:45 PM »
I believe there is a split of views on whether Hengist (and Horsa) are real or 'legendary' personages that acrue local affiliations to legitimise royal lines.... I still tend to the former but see the point of the latter

It is certainly strange that both personages, legendary or real, are named after horses.  Are these real names, nicknames (in the style of the later Scandinavians) or even titles? 
  • Anthony Clipsom

Holly

  • Committee Member
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4639
  • Country: wales
  • Dave Hollin aka The Backpackbrewer
    • The Backpackbrewer
  • Interests: Ancients, Dark Ages
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #171 on: January 13, 2020, 05:30:10 PM »
I believe there is a split of views on whether Hengist (and Horsa) are real or 'legendary' personages that acrue local affiliations to legitimise royal lines.... I still tend to the former but see the point of the latter

It is certainly strange that both personages, legendary or real, are named after horses.  Are these real names, nicknames (in the style of the later Scandinavians) or even titles?

one only has to look at Arthur.... arth is bear in welsh, ur(sus) is bear in latin etc etc ad finitum  :)
  • Dave Hollin

Holly

  • Committee Member
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4639
  • Country: wales
  • Dave Hollin aka The Backpackbrewer
    • The Backpackbrewer
  • Interests: Ancients, Dark Ages
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #172 on: January 16, 2020, 09:37:38 PM »
  • Dave Hollin

aligern

  • Committee Member
  • Society Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Country: gb
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #173 on: Today at 08:34:54 AM »
Is there a tendency for Late Antique Authors in Britain, both British and German to try and weave in every source, perhaps without a hard and fast distinction . So a ‘bardic’ tale or legend or royal myth of The Kentish ‘dynasty’ having a horse totem and maybe once horse cult gets fitted in as the arriving  leader’s brother. It is likely that tge early German leaders had part time priestly roles in an elite cult so it might be that they had two names for their secular and religious roles or could someone else in the royal clan perform the priestly function?
I don’t doubt tgat they had the priests who contended with the Christians, just to what extent these formed a separate profession as opposed to being members of the ruling class or the ruler, with dual functions?
Roy
  • Roy Boss

Erpingham

  • Society Member
  • Posts: 5383
  • Country: gb
  • Interests: Medieval warfare, Old School, home made rules
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #174 on: Today at 10:00:12 AM »
https://www.archaeology.co.uk/articles/axe-the-anglo-saxons.htm

of related interest.....

An interesting contrast.  I'm not sure it fully explains how these new polities come into existence, or, if all was harmonius, why Gildas' account clearly talks of conflict and the early medieval (aka Anglo-Saxon) tradition also talked of conflict.  Presumably, the dyke building craze in this theory were just territorial markers with no military function?

I did like the idea of the reason we all speak English is because we adopted a version of the working language of our new economic sphere centred on the North Sea in the East, as the economic dominance of Rome faded. 
  • Anthony Clipsom

Andreas Johansson

  • Society Member
  • Posts: 2265
  • Country: se
Re: Arthur's dykes
« Reply #175 on: Today at 10:28:41 AM »
An interesting contrast.  I'm not sure it fully explains how these new polities come into existence, or, if all was harmonius, why Gildas' account clearly talks of conflict and the early medieval (aka Anglo-Saxon) tradition also talked of conflict.

A harmonious interlude that just happens to fall into the ill-attested period between the invasions and civil wars of the fourth century and the wars of the seventh strikes me as a wee bit suspicious.
Quote
I did like the idea of the reason we all speak English is because we adopted a version of the working language of our new economic sphere centred on the North Sea in the East, as the economic dominance of Rome faded.
The linguistic content of the article is frankly mostly bonkers. Old English was a firmly Germanic language, with surprisingly little British influence (something that has been taken as evidence that Latin had largely replaced British in much of England by AD 400 or so - Latin influence is more evident).
  • Andreas Johansson
Lead Mountain 2020
Bought: 0 infantry, 4 cavalry, 0 chariots, 3 other
Finished: 14 infantry, 0 cavalry, 0 chariots, 0 other